Other than teaching to national standards, which is a requirement no matter what course you teach there are four important concepts to think about when designing. I found this excellent article on :What is backward design?
The main four points of the article were that backward design helps a teacher select topics that help them teach for understanding.
First, the topic has to have importance and meaning in the student's life. For example, how are patterns used in everyday life. A specific example is a pin number or and id number. How important in a persons life are codes and numbers. You can't get any more important than a social security number, and also it is such an important number in a person's life that codes are developed to protect it.
Second, the topic is one that is essential to the discipline. For example, the difference between numbers used as counting and numbers used as code. There is a big difference when you use a credit card for example between the price you pay for an item, the UPC code of the item, and your credit card number and pin number.
Third, what topic do most students intuitively struggle with? For example, students struggle with the concept of base. They are all familiar with base ten, but students who use other bases everyday do not grasp the mathematical significance. We count money in base 10, time in base 60, eggs in base 12, computers in base 2, and in the US uses a system of measurement based on 12, 3,5280 (horrible!!!).
Fourth, the topic is one that is engaging. For example, the performance assessments I used in the unit on patterns in everyday life.
Next I wanted to apply what I have learned through the course to the concept of backward design. I found another web site that lets you test your Teaching Goals applying what is important to your course and assessments. There were no right or wrong answers. It inventoried what I thought was important as opposed to most teachers.
"Teaching Goals Inventory. This tool, originally created by Patricia Cross and Thomas Angelo, contains 53 prompts to help instructors identify their goals for a particular course. This on-line version offers rapid self-scoring and data comparisons across goal areas and disciplines"
The results of my Teaching Goals Inventory:
- I rated Higher Order Thinking Skills as my top concern (100%).
- Next in importance came Basic Academic Skills (56%0,
- Then came Discipline, Specific Knowledge and Skills (38%) pretty much tied with Liberal Arts and Academic Values were next (40%),
- Last were Personal Development(33%) and Work and Career Prep (25%).
I compared it to the results of the general population of teachers taking the inventory:
1. Higher order thinking skills (43%-45%)
2. Discipline Specific (36%-37%)
3. Personal Development ((25%-28%)
4. Work and Career ((21%-26%)
5. Liberal Arts (18%-21%)
6. Basic Skills (18%-22%)
I identified my primary goal as a teacher as "Helping students develop higher-order thinking skills,"
I identified the following as skills needed:
- Apply Principals
- Math Skills
- Terms and Facts
- Wise decisions
- Analytic Skills
- Think for Self
- Creativity
- Writing skills
- Openness to ideas
- Problem Solving
Math and Science Teachers overall identified the top skills as:
- Math skills
- Analytic skills
- Problem solving.
- Apply Principles
- Terms and Facts
It seems as though most Math and Science teachers rate skills, facts, and applications more important than reasoning, making wise decisions and creativity..